1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Gesture
  4. Volume 21, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 21, Issue 2-3
  • ISSN 1568-1475
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9773
GBP
Buy:£15.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper investigates gesture as a resource for marking politeness-related meanings. We asked 14 Korean and 14 Catalan participants to retell a cartoon, once to an unknown superior and once to a close friend. Participants in both languages curtail gestures when interacting with a socially distant superior. Speakers of both languages produced fewer gestures when addressing the superior, reduced their gesture space, decreased the encoding of , and reduced the use of character-viewpoint gestures. We see the decrease in gesture frequency and the less frequent encoding of as indicators of lower levels of iconicity when talking with status superiors. Curtailing gesture marks a less playful communicative context, and a more serious and deferential persona. Altogether, our research speaks to the importance of politeness in gesture production, and the social nature of gestures in human communication.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/gest.20034.bro
2023-01-10
2024-04-19

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/gest.20034.bro
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alibali, Martha W. & Don, Lisa S.
    (2001) Children’s gestures are meant to be seen. Gesture, 1 (2), 113–127. 10.1075/gest.1.2.02ali
     https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.1.2.02ali [Google Scholar]
  2. Allen, Shanley, Özyürek, Aslı, Kita, Sotaro, Brown, Amanda, Furman, Reyhan, Ishizuka, Tomoko, & Fujii, Mihoko
    (2007) Language-specific and universal influences in children’s syntactic packaging of manner and path: A comparison of English, Japanese, and Turkish. Cognition, 102 (1), 16–48. 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.12.006
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2005.12.006 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bavelas, Janet, Gerwing, Jennifer, Sutton, Chantelle, & Prevost, Danielle
    (2008) Gesturing on the telephone: Independent effects of dialogue and visibility. Journal of Memory and Language, 58 (2), 495–520. 10.1016/j.jml.2007.02.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.02.004 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bavelas, Janet & Healing, Sara
    (2013) Reconciling the effects of mutual visibility on gesturing: A review. Gesture, 13 (1), 63–92. 10.1075/gest.13.1.03bav
     https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.13.1.03bav [Google Scholar]
  5. Beattie, Geoffrey & Aboudan, Rima
    (1994) Gestures, pauses and speech: An experimental investigation of the effects of changing social context on their precise temporal relationships. Semiotica, 99 (3/4), 239–272. 10.1515/semi‑1994‑993‑402
     https://doi.org/10.1515/semi-1994-993-402 [Google Scholar]
  6. Beattie, Geoffrey & Shovelton, Heather
    (2002) An experimental investigation of some properties of individual iconic gestures that mediate their communicative power. British Journal of Psychology, 93 (2), 179–192. 10.1348/000712602162526
     https://doi.org/10.1348/000712602162526 [Google Scholar]
  7. Beaulieu, Catherine
    (2004) Intercultural study of personal space: A case study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34 (4), 794–805. 10.1111/j.1559‑1816.2004.tb02571.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02571.x [Google Scholar]
  8. Blokpoel, Mark, van Kesteren, Marlieke, Stolk, Arjen, Haselager, Pim, Toni, Ivan, & Van Rooij, Iris
    (2012) Recipient design in human communication: Simple heuristics or perspective taking?Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 61, 253. 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00253
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00253 [Google Scholar]
  9. Brown, Amanda & Chen, Jidong
    (2013) Construal of Manner in speech and gesture in Mandarin, English, and Japanese. Cognitive Linguistics, 24 (4), 605–631. 10.1515/cog‑2013‑0021
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2013-0021 [Google Scholar]
  10. Brown, Lucien
    (2011) Korean honorifics and politeness in second language learning. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/pbns.206
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.206 [Google Scholar]
  11. (2015) Honorifics and politeness. InLucien Brown & Jaehoon Yeon (Eds.), The handbook of Korean linguistics (pp.303–319). New York: Wiley. 10.1002/9781118371008.ch17
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118371008.ch17 [Google Scholar]
  12. Brown, Lucien & Prieto, Pilar
    (2017) (Im)politeness: Prosody and gesture. InJonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh, & Daniel Kádár (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of linguistic (im)politeness (pp.357–379). London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑37508‑7_14
     https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7_14 [Google Scholar]
  13. Brown, Lucien & Winter, Bodo
    (2019) Multimodal indexicality in Korean: “Doing deference” and “performing intimacy” through nonverbal behavior. Journal of Politeness Research, 15 (1), 25–54. 10.1515/pr‑2016‑0042
     https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2016-0042 [Google Scholar]
  14. Brown, Lucien, Winter, Bodo, Idemaru, Kaori, & Grawunder, Sven
    (2014) Phonetics and politeness: Perceiving Korean honorific and non-honorific speech through phonetic cues. Journal of Pragmatics, 661, 45–60. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.02.011
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.02.011 [Google Scholar]
  15. Brown, Penelope
    (2015) Politeness and language. InJames D. Wright (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (IESBS) (2nd Ed., Vol.181, pp.326–330). Amsterdam: Elsevier. 10.1016/B978‑0‑08‑097086‑8.53072‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.53072-4 [Google Scholar]
  16. Brown, Penelope & Levinson, Stephen
    (1987) Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  17. Burgoon, Judee K. & Dunbar, Norah E.
    (2006) Nonverbal expressions of dominance and power in human relationships. InValerie Manusov & Miles L. Patterson (Eds.), The Sage handbook of nonverbal communication (pp.279–297). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishers. 10.4135/9781412976152.n15
     https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412976152.n15 [Google Scholar]
  18. Bürkner, Paul-Christian
    (2017) brms: An R package for Bayesian multilevel models using Stan. Journal of Statistical Software, 80 (1), 1–28. 10.18637/jss.v080.i01
     https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v080.i01 [Google Scholar]
  19. Christie, Christine
    (2018) The indexical scope of adios: A relevance theoretic analysis of discursive constructions of gender and institutions and their impact on utterance interpretation. Journal of Politeness Research, 14 (1), 97–119. 10.1515/pr‑2017‑0050
     https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2017-0050 [Google Scholar]
  20. Chu, Mingyuan, Meyer, Antje, Foulkes, Lucy, & Kita, Sotaro
    (2014) Individual differences in frequency and saliency of speech-accompanying gestures: The role of cognitive abilities and empathy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143 (2), 694–709. 10.1037/a0033861
     https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033861 [Google Scholar]
  21. Cook, Haruko Minegishi
    (2008) Socializing identities through speech style: Learners of Japanese as a foreign language. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847691026
     https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847691026 [Google Scholar]
  22. Dalmau, Maria Sabaté i & Gotor, Hortènsia Curell i
    (2007) From “Sorry very much” to “I’m ever so sorry”: Acquisitional patterns in L2 apologies by Catalan learners of English. Intercultural Pragmatics, 4 (2), 287–315. 10.1515/IP.2007.014
     https://doi.org/10.1515/IP.2007.014 [Google Scholar]
  23. Dennison, Heeyon Y. & Bergen, Benjamin K.
    (2010) Language-driven motor simulation is sensitive to social context. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 321, 901–906.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Dingemanse, Mark & Thompson, Bill
    (2020) Playful iconicity: Structural markedness underlies the relation between funniness and iconicity. Language and Cognition, 12 (1), 203–224. 10.1017/langcog.2019.49
     https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2019.49 [Google Scholar]
  25. ELAN (Version 6.0)
    ELAN (Version 6.0) (2020) Nijmeden: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
  26. Galati, Alexia & Brennan, Susan E.
    (2014) Speakers adapt gestures to addressees’ knowledge: Implications for models of co-speech gesture. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29 (4), 435–451. 10.1080/01690965.2013.796397
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2013.796397 [Google Scholar]
  27. Goldin-Meadow, Susan & Saltzman, Jody
    (2000) The cultural bounds of maternal accommodation: How Chinese and American mothers communicate with deaf and hearing children. Psychological Science, 11 (4), 307–314. 10.1111/1467‑9280.00261
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00261 [Google Scholar]
  28. Goldsmith, Daena J.
    (2007) Brown and Levinson’s politeness theory. InBryan B. Whaley & Wendy Samter (Eds.), Explaining communication: Contemporary theories and exemplars (pp.219–236). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Guerrero, Laura K. & Floyd, Kory
    (2006) Nonverbal communication in close relationships. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. 10.4324/9781410617064
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410617064 [Google Scholar]
  30. Holler, Judith, Tutton, Mark, & Wilkin, Katie
    (2011) Co-speech gestures in the process of meaning coordination. In2nd Gesture & Speech in Interaction (GeSpin). https://pure.mpg.de/rest/items/item_1105560/component/file_1105561/content
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Holler, Judith & Wilkin, Katie
    (2009) Communicating common ground: How mutually shared knowledge influences speech and gesture in a narrative task. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24 (2), 267–289. 10.1080/01690960802095545
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960802095545 [Google Scholar]
  32. Holtgraves, Thomas & Yang, Joong-Nam
    (1992) Interpersonal underpinnings of request strategies: General principles and differences due to culture and gender. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62 (2), 246. 10.1037/0022‑3514.62.2.246
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.62.2.246 [Google Scholar]
  33. Hübscher, Iris, Borràs-Comes, Joan, & Prieto, Pilar
    (2017) Prosodic mitigation characterizes Catalan formal speech: The Frequency Code reassessed. Journal of Phonetics, 651, 145–159. 10.1016/j.wocn.2017.07.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2017.07.001 [Google Scholar]
  34. Hübscher, Iris, Sánchez-Conde, Cristina, Borràs-Comes, Joan, Vincze, Laura, & Prieto, Pilar
    . (forthcoming). Multimodal mitigation: How facial and body cues index social meaning in Catalan requests. Journal of Politeness Research.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Idemaru, Kaori, Winter, Bodo, & Brown, Lucien
    (2019) Cross-cultural multimodal politeness: The phonetics of Japanese deferential speech in comparison to Korean. Intercultural Pragmatics, 16 (5), 517–555. 10.1515/ip‑2019‑0027
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2019-0027 [Google Scholar]
  36. Idemaru, Kaori, Winter, Bodo, Brown, Lucien, & Oh, Grace Eunhae
    (2020) Loudness trumps pitch in politeness judgments: Evidence from Korean deferential speech. Language and Speech, 63 (1), 123–148. 10.1177/0023830918824344
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830918824344 [Google Scholar]
  37. Iverson, Jana M., Capirci, Olga, Volterra, Virginia, & Goldin-Meadow, Susan
    (2008) Learning to talk in a gesture-rich world: Early communication in Italian vs. American children. First Language, 28 (2), 164–181. 10.1177/0142723707087736
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723707087736 [Google Scholar]
  38. Jacobs, Naomi & Garnham, Alan
    (2007) The role of conversational hand gestures in a narrative task. Journal of Memory and Language, 56 (2), 291–303. 10.1016/j.jml.2006.07.011
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.07.011 [Google Scholar]
  39. Kádár, Dániel Z. & Haugh, Michael
    (2013) Understanding politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139382717
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139382717 [Google Scholar]
  40. Kelly, Spencer, Byrne, Kelly, & Holler, Judith
    (2011) Raising the ante of communication: Evidence for enhanced gesture use in high stakes situations. Information, 2 (4), 579–593. 10.3390/info2040579
     https://doi.org/10.3390/info2040579 [Google Scholar]
  41. Kiesling, Scott F.
    (2004) Dude. American Speech, 79 (3), 281–305. 10.1215/00031283‑79‑3‑281
     https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-79-3-281 [Google Scholar]
  42. Kita, Sotaro
    (2000) How representational gestures help speaking. Language and Gesture, 11, 162–185. 10.1017/CBO9780511620850.011
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620850.011 [Google Scholar]
  43. (2009) Cross-cultural variation of speech-accompanying gesture: A review. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24 (2), 145–167. 10.1080/01690960802586188
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960802586188 [Google Scholar]
  44. Kita, Sotaro & Essegbey, James
    (2001) Pointing left in Ghana: How a taboo on the use of the left hand influences gestural practice. Gesture, 1 (1), 73–95. 10.1075/gest.1.1.06kit
     https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.1.1.06kit [Google Scholar]
  45. Kita, Sotaro & Ide, Sachiko
    (2007) Nodding, aizuchi, and final particles in Japanese conversation: How conversation reflects the ideology of communication and social relationships. Journal of Pragmatics, 39 (7), 1242–1254. 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.02.009
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.02.009 [Google Scholar]
  46. Kita, Sotaro & Özyürek, Aslı
    (2003) What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal? Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language, 48 (1), 16–32. 10.1016/S0749‑596X(02)00505‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00505-3 [Google Scholar]
  47. Koo, Jasook
    (1995) Politeness theory: Universality and specificity. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
  48. Krahmer, Emiel & Swerts, Marc
    (2007) The effects of visual beats on prosodic prominence: Acoustic analyses, auditory perception and visual perception. Journal of Memory and Language, 57 (3), 396–414. 10.1016/j.jml.2007.06.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.06.005 [Google Scholar]
  49. Leech, Geoffrey N.
    (2016) Principles of pragmatics. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315835976
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315835976 [Google Scholar]
  50. Lempert, Michael
    (2011) Barack Obama, being sharp: Indexical order in the pragmatics of precision-grip gesture. Gesture, 11 (3), 241–270. 10.1075/gest.11.3.01lem
     https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.11.3.01lem [Google Scholar]
  51. McNeill, David
    (1992) Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. (2005) Gesture and thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226514642.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226514642.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  53. McNeill, David & Duncan, Susan D.
    (2000) Growth points in thinking-for-speaking. InDavid McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp.141–161). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620850.010
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620850.010 [Google Scholar]
  54. Nadeu, Marianna & Prieto, Pilar
    (2011) Pitch range, gestural information, and perceived politeness in Catalan. Journal of Pragmatics, 43 (3), 841–854. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.09.015
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.09.015 [Google Scholar]
  55. Newman-Norlund, Sarah E., Noordzij, Matthijs L., Newman-Norlund, Roger D., Volman, Inge A. C., de Ruiter, Jan Peter, Hagoort, Peter, & Toni, Ivan
    (2009) Recipient design in tacit communication. Cognition, 111 (1), 46–54. 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.12.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.12.004 [Google Scholar]
  56. Nicoladis, Elena, Nagpal, Jaya, Marentette, Paula, & Hauer, Brandon
    (2018) Gesture frequency is linked to story-telling style: Evidence from bilinguals. Language and Cognition, 10 (4), 641–664. 10.1017/langcog.2018.25
     https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2018.25 [Google Scholar]
  57. Ochs, Elinor
    (1993) Constructing social identity: A language socialization perspective. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 26 (3), 287–306. 10.1207/s15327973rlsi2603_3
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2603_3 [Google Scholar]
  58. Orie, Ọlanikẹ Ọla
    (2009) Pointing the Yoruba way. Gesture, 9 (2), 237–261. 10.1075/gest.9.2.04ori
     https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.9.2.04ori [Google Scholar]
  59. Özyürek, Aslı
    (2002) Do speakers design their cospeech gestures for their addressees? The effects of addressee location on representational gestures. Journal of Memory and Language, 46 (4), 688–704. 10.1006/jmla.2001.2826
     https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2001.2826 [Google Scholar]
  60. Özyürek, Aslı, Kita, Sotaro, Allen, Shanley, Brown, Amanda, Furman, Reyhan, & Ishizuka, Tomoko
    (2008) Development of cross-linguistic variation in speech and gesture: Motion events in English and Turkish. Developmental Psychology, 44 (4), 1040. 10.1037/0012‑1649.44.4.1040
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.44.4.1040 [Google Scholar]
  61. Özyürek, Aslı, Hickman, M., Veneziano, E., & Jisa, H.
    (2018) Cross-linguistic variation in children’s multimodal utterances. InMaya Hickmann, Edy Veneziano, & Harriet Jisa (Eds.), Sources of variation in first language acquisition: Languages, contexts, and learners (pp.123–138). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tilar.22.07ozy
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.22.07ozy [Google Scholar]
  62. Parrill, Fey
    (2010a) The hands are part of the package: Gesture, common ground, and information packaging. InSally Rice & John Newman (Eds.), Empirical and experimental methods in cognitive/functional research (pp.285–302). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. (2010b) Viewpoint in speech–gesture integration: Linguistic structure, discourse structure, and event structure. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25 (5), 650–668. 10.1080/01690960903424248
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960903424248 [Google Scholar]
  64. Paxton, Alexandra & Dale, Rick
    (2013) Frame-differencing methods for measuring bodily synchrony in conversation. Behavior Research Methods, 45 (2), 329–343. 10.3758/s13428‑012‑0249‑2
     https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0249-2 [Google Scholar]
  65. Peirce, Charles S.
    (1940) The philosophical Peirce: Selected writings (Justus Buchler, Ed.). New York: Harcourt, Brace.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Pizziconi, Barbara & Christie, Chris
    (2017) Indexicality and (im)politeness. InJonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh, & Daniel Kádár (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of linguistic (Im)politeness (pp.143–170). London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑37508‑7_7
     https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7_7 [Google Scholar]
  67. R Core Team
    R Core Team (2019) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Ren-Mitchell, Ada
    (2019) Gesture coding manual. adainspired.mit.edu/gesture-research/gesture-coding-manual/
  69. Silverstein, Michael
    (2003) Indexical order and the dialectics of social life. Language and Communication, 231, 193–229. 10.1016/S0271‑5309(03)00013‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00013-2 [Google Scholar]
  70. So, Wing Chee
    (2010) Cross-cultural transfer in gesture frequency in Chinese–English bilinguals. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25 (10), 1335–1353. 10.1080/01690961003694268
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01690961003694268 [Google Scholar]
  71. Sohn, Ho-Min
    (2001) The Korean Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Stein, Nancy & Glenn, Christine
    (1979) An analysis of story comprehension in elementary school children. InRoy Freedle (Ed.), New directions in discourse processing (pp.53–120). Norwood, NJ: Ablex. https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?hl=en&publication_year=1979&pages=53-120&author=N.+L.+Stein&author=C.+G.+Glenn&title=New+directions+in+discourse+processing
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Talmy, Leonard
    (1985) Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. Language Typology and Syntactic Description, 3 (99), 36–149.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Wickham, Hadley, Averick, Mara, Bryan, Jennifer, Chang, Winston, McGowan, Lucy D’Agostino, François, Romain, […], & Hester, Jim
    (2019) Welcome to the Tidyverse. Journal of Open Source Software, 4 (43), 1686. https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.01686. 10.21105/joss.01686
     https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01686 [Google Scholar]
  75. Winter, Bodo
    (2019) Statistics for linguists: An introduction using R. New York, NY: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315165547
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165547 [Google Scholar]
  76. Winter, Bodo & Bürkner, Paul-Christian
    . (2021). Poisson regression for linguists: A tutorial introduction to modeling count data with brms. Language and Linguistics Compass, e12439. 10.1111/lnc3.12439
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12439 [Google Scholar]
  77. Winter, Bodo & Grawunder, Sven
    (2012) The phonetic profile of Korean formal and informal speech registers. Journal of Phonetics, 40 (6), 808–815. 10.1016/j.wocn.2012.08.006
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2012.08.006 [Google Scholar]
  78. Withey, Alun
    (2015) Technology, self-fashioning and politeness in eighteenth-century Britain: Refined bodies. Basingstoke, Hampshire & New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137467485
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137467485 [Google Scholar]
  79. Woodin, Greg, Winter, Bodo, Perlman, Marcus, Littlemore, Jeannette, & Matlock, Teenie
    (2020) “Tiny numbers” are actually tiny: Evidence from gestures in the TV News Archive. Plos One, 15 (11), e0242142. 10.1371/journal.pone.0242142
     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242142 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/gest.20034.bro
Loading
Gestures are modulated by social context
Gesture 21, 167 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.20034.bro
/content/journals/10.1075/gest.20034.bro
/content/journals/10.1075/gest.20034.bro
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): audience design; iconicity; perspective; pragmatics; social deixis; social distance

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error